Ordinarily I'd agree with you... but there's a big difference between violating ethics rules (which is a testable thing) and believing that CMPA can render in impartial opinion.... especially when CMPA ignores 22 hours of commentary (including prime time) without a good justification (they say that this is impartial because, in 3-7 years from now, they expect other networks to provide slanted coverage the next time a republican is in the whitehouse... huh?)?
Did anyone happen to go to any of his domains? That threat letter from flex.com is ridiculous. Especially if you check out their website...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum