By bandying around terms like "micro evolution" and "macro evolution" you're clearly demonstrating your lack of knowledge of the science of evolution. The terms were coined individually by a Russian entomologist and an American botanist in the early 1900's. But by the 1940's scientists has pretty much universally dropped the "micro" and "macro" prefixes as researchers had started discussing evolution in terms of the changes in allele frequencies (changes in forms of a gene) without any mention of the level or timing of change. You'll find very little, if any use of those terms from the 1940's until just the last few years when anti-evolutionists (young Earth creationists, etc) started misusing the terms. The claim that micro evolution is qualitatively different from macro evolution is bogus, as the main difference between the two processes is that one occurs within a few generations, whilst the other takes place over thousands of years. They describe the same process, just over different spans of time. So if you believe in one then you must believe in the other. By saying you believe in one but not the other you're simply contradicting yourself. It's as if you claim you believe that planting an acorn in the ground will sprout a seedling but you don't believe that in 100 years it'll be a massive oak tree.